Port State Control
Monthly PSC Information
Cases of PSC inspection including detainable deficiency or ISM related deficiency
|December 2017||Excel / Trends of PSC in Indonesia|
|May 2017||Excel / For Safe Navigation using ECDIS|
|April 2017||Excel / Trends of PSC in China|
|July 2015||PDF Excel
Joint Press Release on the Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Crew Familiarization for Enclosed Space Entry
Marine Advisory Note 04-2015 – Detentions Increasing In Australia
|June 2015||PDF Excel
MEASURES TO IMPROVE COMPLIANCE OF RMI VESSELS IN UNITED STATES. PORTS
|May 2015||PDF Excel|
|April 2015||PDF Excel|
|March 2015||PDF Excel|
|February 2015||PDF Excel|
|January 2015||PDF Excel
Unsatisfactory compliance with hours of rest1(Paris MoU)
ClassNK PSC Bulletin
Information on particularly notable or increasing findings pointed out during PSC inspections of NK classed ships
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 13 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 12 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 11 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 10 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 9 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 8 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 7 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 6 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 5 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 4 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 3 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 2 (English)
- ClassNK PSC Bulletin No. 1 (English)
PSC Annual Report
- Port State Control Annual Report June 2017 - English (2452kb)
- Port State Control Annual Report June 2016 - English (1905kb)
- Port State Control Annual Report August 2015 - English (3210kb)
- Port State Control Annual Report August 2014 - English (5337kb)
- Port State Control Annual Report (August 2013) (6851kb)
Download ARRIVAL CHECKLIST for PSC mobile app
ARRIVAL CHECKLIST for PSC mobile app is available for download from the following website.
For iOS users
For AndroidTM users
- The Apple logo is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. iOS is a trademark or registered trademark of Cisco in the U.S. and other countries and is used under license.
- Android, Google Play, and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google Inc.
Shipboard maintenance and operation
A shipowner always needs to ensure that the ship is properly maintained and operated so that it remains in conformance with all applicable international standards and requirements.
Such careful maintenance and operation of the ship will go a long way to avoiding any unnecessary problems during a PSC inspection.
Most lapses and deficiencies onboard can be prevented by doing various operational checks, maintenance and repairs, etc. of machinery and equipment regularly. This includes maintaining shipboard records properly, confirming the validity of all certificates and documents as well as verifying the survey dates of all relevant class and statutory surveys.
In addition, always taking care to keep things onboard ship in good order and striving to improve the shipboard environment can go a long way to not only enhancing safety in daily operations, but is also an effective means of coping with PSC inspections. (Indeed, as the old adage says, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” ) The Society has prepared “Good Maintenance On Board Ships” and “ARRIVAL CHECKLIST for PSC” as a ship management checklist and tool for use during voyages to help Masters and operators achieve these goals more easily.
What is Port State Control?
Port State control, or PSC, is the exercise of the right of a port State, when granting permission to a foreign flagged ship to enter a port of the port State, to inspect the vessel to ensure that it meets international safety, pollution and other requirements.
Various international standards and conventions, such as the SOLAS Convention, MARPOL Convention, and the International Load Line Convention, have been enacted in order to promote the safety of life and property at sea and to protect the marine environment with respect to oceangoing ships. Although the flag State and owner of a ship have fundamental responsibility for ensuring that these requirements are implemented, supervision by the flag State is many times insufficient. There is also often a lack of adequate competence and experience on the part of ship crews and others that can all too often have an adverse impact on safety, as well.
PSC has been established as a means of proactively complementing the role of flag States with the primary aims of improving ship safety and eliminating substandard ships. This consists of conducting inspections of various aspects of a ship once it has arrived in port, including the safety of life and property onboard the ship, prevention of pollution by the ship, and the living and working conditions onboard the ship.
PSC inspection process
A PSC inspection typically consists of a check of the documents and certificates onboard ship combined with a condition survey of the vessel. However, a more detailed survey is carried out if there are “clear grounds” for such, as when deficiencies are found in the ship's compliance with mandatory international requirements, or there is some question as to the safety condition of the vessel. If serious deficiencies are found affecting safety as a result of the inspection, the ship is detained and the captain is instructed to rectify the deficiencies before departure. In the event that the deficiencies are not rectified or no suitable plan is presented for rectifying them, the ship will be prohibited from leaving the port.
The importance of PSC is now recognized by most countries around the world. Regional cooperation among port States has led to the concluding of Memoranda of Understanding, or MOUs, that seek to promote and realize more effective PSC for a given region. The first such agreement was signed in Paris in 1982. Since then, MOUs concerning the implementation of PSC regimes have been concluded in a total of nine regions in the world, as summarized in the following table (only member states are listed).
|Name of Agreement
(European and North Atlantic region)
|Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, the Russian Federation, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom|
|Australia, Canada, Chile, China, Fiji, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, the Marshall Islands, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, the Russian Federation, Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu, Viet Nam|
|Latin American Agreement (Latin-American region)||Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Republic of Dominica, Uruguay, Venezuela|
|Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Cayman Islands, Cuba, Curacao, France, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, the Netherlands, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago|
|Mediterranean MoU (Mediterranean region)||Algeria, Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Malta, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey|
|Indian Ocean MOU (Indian Ocean region)||Australia, Bangladesh, Comoros, Eritrea, France (La Reunion), India, Iran, Kenya, Maldives, Mauritius, Mozambique, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sultanate of Oman, Tanzania, Yemen|
|Black Sea MOU
(Black Sea region)
|Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, the Russian Federation, Turkey, Ukraine|
(West and Central Africa region)
|Angola, Benin, Cape Verde, Republic of Congo, Cote D’Ivoire, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Republic of Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Nigeria, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Togo|
（Arab States of the Gulf）
|Kingdom of Bahrain, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, State of Kuwait, State of Qatar, State of United Arab Emirates, Sultanate of Oman|
Concentrated Inspection Campaigns (CIC)
Regional PSC MOU members will agree to carry out concentrated inspection campaigns from time to time for periods of usually three or four months. These campaigns are often announced beforehand through press releases and other means and generally focus on certain aspects of ship safety. Past inspection campaigns have focused on such areas as follows:
- MLC, 2006
- Structural Safety and Load Lines
- Cargo Securing Arrangements
- Tanker Damage Stability
- Crew Familiarization for Enclosed Space Entry
- Harmful Substances Carried in Packaged Form
- STCW Hours of Rest
- Lifeboat Launching Arrangements
- Propulsion and Auxiliary Machinery
- Safety of Navigation
- Fire Safety Systems
- ISM Code
Activities of the Society
Whenever the Society receives a PSC inspection report from a port State Administration, an investigation is carried out at the Head Office of the Society to determine the cause of the deficiency. The shipowner and flag State are then informed of the results of the investigation, and the results are also input into a dedicated database on PSC maintained by the Society. Effective use is also made of this information through the publication of the Annual Report on Port State Control, and other materials by the Society.
In addition, “Technical Information” releases are issued to provide updates and various notices on a range of topics including information on PSC, whenever necessary.